Every figure this model derived for NXXT, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
0
PaymentsToAcquireProductiveAssets
2024-12-31
cash
1,285,290
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2024-06-30
current assets
5,693,905
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
31,299,028
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
-18,827,124
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
12,987,876
InterestExpenseNonoperating
2026-06-30
ocf
-12,728,594
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
94,678,116
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
17,333
ShareBasedCompensation
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
NXXT on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-48.24
current ratio
0.18
current ratio reported
0.18
dilution pct
3313.04
fcf margin
-13.44
growth cv
0.62
interest cover
-3.71
operating margin
-50.9
owner earnings margin
-13.46
revenue growth
90.34
revenue growth per share
-94.42
rule of 40
39.43
sbc pct revenue
0.02
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about NXXT's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2024-12-31); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
gross profit not tagged; rebuilt from Revenues - CostOfGoodsAndServicesSold
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality rests on 4 of 5 inputs; not tagged: roic
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage