Every figure this model derived for NXTT, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
0
PaymentsToAcquireOtherPropertyPlantAndEquipment
2023-09-30
cash
159,043,268
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
512,362,615
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
2,918,215
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
485,352,328
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
ocf
-3,074,693
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-31
revenue
12,920,940
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
85,183,844
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
NXTT on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-44.53
current ratio
182.44
current ratio reported
175.57
dilution pct
7949.92
fcf margin
-23.8
growth cv
2.09
operating margin
-703.8
owner earnings margin
-683.07
revenue growth
299.21
revenue growth per share
-95.04
roic
-22.02
rule of 40
-404.6
sbc pct revenue
659.27
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about NXTT's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
WITHHELD: net margin -- net margin came out at -2,356% against a scale that tops out near 1,500%, which is arithmetic on a revenue figure of 12,920,940 rather than a margin. The figure is absent rather than corrected: there is no right value to put here.
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2023-09-30); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no debt and no profit, so interest cover cannot be measured; scored on cash runway instead: 159M of net cash against a 3M annual burn is 51.7 years
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions