Every figure this model derived for NXMH, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2024-01-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
cash
40,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2024-01-31
current assets
396,935
AssetsCurrent
2024-01-31
current liabilities
1,036,687
LiabilitiesCurrent
2024-01-31
equity
-890,585
StockholdersEquity
2024-01-31
interest expense
13,542
InterestPaid
2024-01-31
ocf
-1,076,262
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2024-01-31
revenue
903,604
Revenues
2024-01-31
sbc
0
ShareBasedCompensation
2021-04-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
NXMH on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
84.97
current ratio
0.38
current ratio reported
0.38
dilution pct
0.38
ebit cagr
28.6
ebit yoy
-32.27
fcf margin
-119.11
interest cover
54.66
operating margin
81.92
owner earnings margin
-119.11
revenue growth
-48.32
revenue growth per share
-48.52
rule of 40
33.6
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about NXMH's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
newest fact in the filing is 2024-03-25 (2y old); this company's data is not usable and the scores below should be ignored
revenue period ends 2024-01-31 (942 days ago) - the tag chain found nothing recent, so treat this row as unscored
no current stock compensation tagged (last tagged 2021-04-30); treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no current capital expenditure tagged; treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
invested capital is -1M (cash exceeds equity plus debt), so return on capital is unbounded rather than undefined; scored as maximal
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, contracted coverage not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: sustained growth
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability -- 35% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left