Every figure this model derived for NVMI, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
27,698,000
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2025-12-31
cash
536,260,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2025-12-31
current assets
1,410,802,000
AssetsCurrent
2025-12-31
current liabilities
224,535,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2025-12-31
equity
1,318,248,000
StockholdersEquity
2025-12-31
interest expense
1,996,000
InterestExpenseDebt
2025-12-31
ocf
245,613,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-31
revenue
880,577,000
Revenues
2025-12-31
sbc
26,291,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
NVMI on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
33.3
current ratio
8.96
current ratio reported
6.28
deferred revenue growth
-7.85
dilution pct
2.06
ebit cagr
22.55
ebit yoy
35.15
fcf margin
24.75
growth cv
0.73
interest cover
126.99
operating margin
28.78
owner earnings margin
21.76
revenue growth
30.96
revenue growth per share
28.32
roic
25.61
rule of 40
59.75
sbc pct revenue
2.99
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about NVMI's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2025-12-31 (242 days old, balance sheet); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions