Every figure this model derived for NUAI, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
4,538,891
PaymentsToAcquireOtherPropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-06-30
cash
69,821,390
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
89,151,760
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
6,271,993
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
138,584,967
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
4,242,682
InterestExpenseNonoperating
2026-06-30
ocf
-17,899,284
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
900,915
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
975,672
ShareBasedCompensation
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
NUAI on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
current ratio
14.21
current ratio reported
14.21
dilution pct
119.09
fcf margin
-2490.6
interest cover
-11.11
revenue growth
25.34
revenue growth per share
-42.79
roic
-51.65
rule of 40
-5207.72
sbc pct revenue
108.3
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about NUAI's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
WITHHELD: operating margin, cash operating margin, owner earnings margin, net margin, ebitda margin -- net margin came out at -5,986% against a scale that tops out near 1,500%, which is arithmetic on a revenue figure of 900,915 rather than a margin. The figure is absent rather than corrected: there is no right value to put here.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 5 inputs could be computed (operating margin, owner earnings, cash operating margin not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: sustained growth
3 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (quality, valuation, durability -- 65% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left