Every figure this model derived for NTRR, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2023-10-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
0
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2022-01-31
cash
692
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2023-10-31
current assets
19,400
AssetsCurrent
2023-10-31
current liabilities
908,828
LiabilitiesCurrent
2023-10-31
equity
-936,040
StockholdersEquity
2023-10-31
interest expense
18,021
InterestExpense
2023-10-31
ocf
-9,764
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2023-10-31
revenue
17,397
Revenues
2023-10-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
NTRR on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-1103.36
current ratio
0.02
current ratio reported
0.02
fcf margin
-56.12
growth cv
1.36
interest cover
-14.07
operating margin
-1457.11
owner earnings margin
-56.12
revenue growth
-82.68
revenue growth per share
-82.68
rule of 40
-1539.8
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about NTRR's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
WITHHELD: net margin -- net margin came out at -2,724% against a scale that tops out near 1,500%, which is arithmetic on a revenue figure of 17,397 rather than a margin. The figure is absent rather than corrected: there is no right value to put here.
newest fact in the filing is 2023-10-31 (2y old); this company's data is not usable and the scores below should be ignored
revenue period ends 2023-10-31 (1034 days ago) - the tag chain found nothing recent, so treat this row as unscored
no current stock compensation tagged; treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2022-01-31); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality rests on 4 of 5 inputs; not tagged: roic
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: sustained growth