Every figure this model derived for NTIP, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
0
PaymentsToAcquireProductiveAssets
2011-12-31
cash
33,752,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
33,901,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
722,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
37,499,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
ocf
-1,609,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
150,000
Revenues
2025-12-31
sbc
267,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
NTIP on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
current ratio
46.95
current ratio reported
46.95
dilution pct
-1.73
fcf margin
-1072.67
growth cv
2.43
owner earnings margin
-1250.67
revenue growth
50.0
revenue growth per share
52.64
roic
-92.11
rule of 40
-2862.67
sbc pct revenue
178.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about NTIP's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
WITHHELD: operating margin, cash operating margin, net margin -- operating margin came out at -2,913% against a scale that tops out near 2,500%, which is arithmetic on a revenue figure of 150,000 rather than a margin. The figure is absent rather than corrected: there is no right value to put here.
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2011-12-31); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
gross profit not tagged since 2015-09-30; rebuilt from Revenues - CostOfRevenue
no debt and no profit, so interest cover cannot be measured; scored on cash runway instead: 34M of net cash against a 2M annual burn is 21.0 years
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality rests on 3 of 5 inputs; not tagged: operating margin, cash operating margin
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage