Every figure this model derived for NODK, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
96,000
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-06-30
cash
52,109,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
equity
249,376,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
ocf
-32,516,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
267,395,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
828,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
NODK on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
4.73
dilution pct
-0.46
ebit yoy
298.5
fcf margin
-12.2
operating margin
4.18
owner earnings margin
-12.51
revenue growth
-13.85
revenue growth per share
-13.45
roic
4.43
rule of 40
-9.67
sbc pct revenue
0.31
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about NODK's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no operating income tagged; derived as revenue minus OperatingExpenses
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no debt and no profit, so interest cover cannot be measured; scored on cash runway instead: 50M of net cash against a 33M annual burn is 1.5 years
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: liquidity
no interest expense tagged while 2M of debt is on the balance sheet, so interest cover is unmeasured rather than perfect