Every figure this model derived for NMTC, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
109,536
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-06-30
cash
3,043,028
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
5,788,801
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
2,041,427
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
3,767,543
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
ocf
-7,052,007
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
9,468,715
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
1,412,727
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
NMTC on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-66.01
current ratio
2.84
current ratio reported
2.84
deferred revenue growth
16777.62
fcf margin
-75.63
growth cv
1.75
operating margin
-83.43
owner earnings margin
-90.55
revenue growth
42.84
revenue growth per share
42.84
roic
-861.39
rule of 40
-40.59
sbc pct revenue
14.92
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about NMTC's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
diluted share count moved +50% in a year (27M to 40M, a ratio of 1.50), which is a stock split rather than issuance; growth is measured on total revenue, not per share
no debt and no profit, so interest cover cannot be measured; scored on cash runway instead: 3M of net cash against a 7M annual burn is 0.4 years
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage