Every figure this model derived for NGL, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
307,911,000
PaymentsToAcquireProductiveAssets
2026-06-30
cash
12,971,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
737,601,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
644,715,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
interest expense
259,013,000
InterestExpense
2026-06-30
ocf
409,789,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
3,523,995,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
11,206,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-03-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
NGL on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
10.55
current ratio
1.18
current ratio reported
1.14
deferred revenue growth
68.39
ebit cagr
-25.26
ebit yoy
-71.24
fcf margin
2.89
interest cover
0.37
net debt ebitda
9.11
operating margin
2.69
owner earnings margin
2.57
revenue growth
5.76
revenue growth per share
5.76
rpo growth
75.78
rule of 40
8.45
sbc pct revenue
0.32
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about NGL's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
operating income is annual, not TTM
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
invested capital is 0M (cash exceeds equity plus debt), so return on capital is unbounded rather than undefined; scored as maximal
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
gross profit not tagged since 2012-03-31; rebuilt from Revenues - CostOfGoodsAndServicesSold
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions