New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership (NEN)
Every figure this model derived for NEN, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
cash
24,749,739
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
interest expense
22,103,210
InterestExpenseNonoperating
2026-06-30
ocf
17,217,403
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
95,832,006
Revenues
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
NEN on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
46.48
ebit cagr
-7.86
ebit yoy
-48.49
fcf margin
17.97
growth cv
0.46
interest cover
0.61
net debt ebitda
11.33
operating margin
14.18
owner earnings margin
17.97
revenue growth
16.14
revenue growth per share
16.14
rule of 40
30.31
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about NEN's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no current stock compensation tagged; treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no current capital expenditure tagged; treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
invested capital is 0M (cash exceeds equity plus debt), so return on capital is unbounded rather than undefined; scored as maximal
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
gross profit not tagged; rebuilt from Revenues - CostOfPropertyRepairsAndMaintenance
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: liquidity