Every figure this model derived for MTEKW, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
22,700
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2025-12-31
cash
5,568,610
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2025-12-31
current assets
6,262,879
AssetsCurrent
2025-12-31
current liabilities
3,985,903
LiabilitiesCurrent
2025-12-31
equity
601,583
StockholdersEquity
2025-12-31
interest expense
14,849
InterestPaidNet
2025-12-31
ocf
-3,408,749
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-31
revenue
1,341,218
Revenues
2025-12-31
sbc
166,571
ShareBasedCompensation
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
MTEKW on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-368.43
current ratio
1.57
current ratio reported
1.57
dilution pct
1.76
fcf margin
-255.85
growth cv
1.9
interest cover
-351.84
operating margin
-389.53
owner earnings margin
-268.27
revenue growth
-77.94
revenue growth per share
-78.32
rpo growth
7.93
rule of 40
-467.47
sbc pct revenue
12.42
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about MTEKW's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2025-12-31 (242 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality rests on 4 of 5 inputs; not tagged: roic
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage