Every figure this model derived for MRK, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
3,904,000,000
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-06-30
cash
7,141,000,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
36,679,000,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
27,731,000,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
41,933,000,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
1,742,000,000
InterestExpenseNonoperating
2026-06-30
ocf
19,967,000,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
66,569,000,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
892,000,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
MRK on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
16.65
current ratio
1.32
current ratio reported
1.32
dilution pct
-1.34
ev ebit
59.51
ev owner earnings
27.4
ev sales
6.24
fcf margin
24.13
growth cv
0.86
interest cover
4.01
net debt ebitda
4.59
operating margin
10.49
owner earnings margin
22.79
revenue growth
4.64
revenue growth per share
6.06
roic
6.22
rule of 40
15.13
sbc pct revenue
1.34
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about MRK's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
presents no operating result; summed as revenue minus the costs it does tag (CostOfGoodsAndServicesSold, SellingGeneralAndAdministrativeExpense, ResearchAndDevelopmentExpense). Checked against the company's own figures: the answer lands 1.6% of revenue from the 5,948M pre-tax profit it reports, which is its interest and other non-operating items
gross profit not tagged; rebuilt from Revenues - CostOfGoodsAndServicesSold
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage
growth DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (margin trend, margin recent not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions