Every figure this model derived for MRAI, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
0
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2022-12-31
cash
138,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
9,004,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
23,546,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
-38,891,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
3,603,000
InterestExpenseNonoperating
2026-06-30
ocf
-8,705,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
16,635,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
3,691,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
MRAI on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-58.29
current ratio
0.39
current ratio reported
0.38
deferred revenue growth
-57.34
fcf margin
-52.33
growth cv
2.92
interest cover
-3.78
operating margin
-81.84
owner earnings margin
-74.52
revenue growth
-29.73
revenue growth per share
-29.73
rpo growth
-19.43
rule of 40
-111.57
sbc pct revenue
22.19
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about MRAI's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2022-12-31); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
diluted share count moved +51% in a year (12M to 17M, a ratio of 1.51), which is a stock split rather than issuance; growth is measured on total revenue, not per share
gross profit not tagged; rebuilt from Revenues - CostOfGoodsAndServiceExcludingDepreciationDepletionAndAmortization - dep_amort
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality rests on 4 of 5 inputs; not tagged: roic
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions