Every figure this model derived for MOVE, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
0
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2024-12-31
cash
21,695,822
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
28,262,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
15,680,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
573,251,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
3,174,000
InterestExpenseDebt
2026-06-30
ocf
-13,431,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
4,435,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
13,400,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
MOVE on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-220.54
current ratio
2.04
current ratio reported
1.8
deferred revenue growth
36100.0
dilution pct
39.61
fcf margin
-302.84
interest cover
-8.53
operating margin
-610.33
owner earnings margin
-604.98
revenue growth
843.62
revenue growth per share
575.9
roic
-3.81
rule of 40
233.29
sbc pct revenue
302.14
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about MOVE's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2024-12-31); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
gross profit not tagged; rebuilt from Revenues - CostOfRevenue
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, gross margin stability, cash flow stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (sustained growth, margin trend not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
3 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability, growth -- 55% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left