Ramaco Resources, Inc. (METC)

Every figure this model derived for METC, the value it took, and the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked against the filing rather than taken on trust. As at 2025-12-31.

The figures, and where each came from

This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.

Figure	Value	XBRL tag	As at
capex	0	`PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment`	2024-03-31
cash	287,735,000	`CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue`	2026-06-30
current assets	460,641,000	`AssetsCurrent`	2026-06-30
current liabilities	108,839,000	`LiabilitiesCurrent`	2026-06-30
equity	376,067,000	`StockholdersEquity`	2026-06-30
interest expense	14,705,000	`InterestExpenseNonoperating`	2026-06-30
ocf	1,969,000	`NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities`	2025-12-31
revenue	536,618,000	`RevenueFromContractWithCustomerIncludingAssessedTax`	2025-12-31
sbc	19,339,000	`ShareBasedCompensation`	2026-06-30

The ratios

The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up METC on one particular measure came for.

Ratio	Value
cash operating margin	2.55
current ratio	4.23
current ratio reported	4.23
fcf margin	0.37
growth cv	1.33
interest cover	-4.94
operating margin	-13.54
owner earnings margin	-3.24
revenue growth	-19.46
revenue growth per share	-19.46
roic	-10.04
rule of 40	-33.0
sbc pct revenue	3.6

What to be careful about

What this model itself distrusts about METC's figures. Written by the derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.

revenue is annual, not TTM
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2024-03-31); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2023-06-20 (1167 days old, weighted average diluted); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
gross profit not tagged since 2020-12-31; rebuilt from RevenueFromContractWithCustomerIncludingAssessedTax - CostOfGoodsAndServicesSold
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage