Every figure this model derived for LPG, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
0
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2023-06-30
cash
352,142,818
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
719,086,536
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
220,853,561
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
1,236,519,338
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
30,229,678
InterestAndDebtExpense
2026-06-30
ocf
239,800,989
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
585,184,124
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
11,291,594
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
LPG on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
71.7
current ratio
3.26
current ratio reported
3.26
deferred revenue growth
7617.2
dilution pct
0.9
ebit cagr
17.74
ebit yoy
363.49
fcf margin
40.98
growth cv
2.3
interest cover
11.16
net debt ebitda
0.77
operating margin
57.63
owner earnings margin
39.05
revenue growth
81.06
revenue growth per share
79.44
roic
17.18
rule of 40
138.69
sbc pct revenue
1.93
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about LPG's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2023-06-30); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability -- 35% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left