LOMA NEGRA COMPANIA INDUSTRIALARGENTINA SOCIEDAD ANONIMA (LOMA)

Every figure this model derived for LOMA, the value it took, and the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked against the filing rather than taken on trust. As at 2024-12-31.

The figures, and where each came from

This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.

Figure	Value	XBRL tag	As at
capex	73,047,859,000	`PurchaseOfPropertyPlantAndEquipmentClassifiedAsInvestingActivities`	2024-12-31
cash	8,553,363,000	`CashAndCashEquivalents`	2024-12-31
current assets	273,397,753,000	`CurrentAssets`	2024-12-31
current liabilities	267,821,101,000	`CurrentLiabilities`	2024-12-31
equity	793,343,878,000	`EquityAttributableToOwnersOfParent`	2024-12-31
interest expense	58,265,167,000	`InterestExpense`	2024-12-31
ocf	124,718,080,000	`CashFlowsFromUsedInOperatingActivities`	2024-12-31
revenue	699,178,686,000	`Revenue`	2024-12-31
sbc	682,956,000	`AdjustmentsForSharebasedPayments`	2024-12-31

The ratios

The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up LOMA on one particular measure came for.

Ratio	Value
current ratio	1.02
current ratio reported	1.02
dilution pct	-0.01
fcf margin	7.39
owner earnings margin	7.29
revenue growth	-23.95
revenue growth per share	-23.94
sbc pct revenue	0.1

What to be careful about

What this model itself distrusts about LOMA's figures. Written by the derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.

newest fact in the filing is 2024-12-31 (1y old); this company's data is not usable and the scores below should be ignored
operating income last tagged 2021-12-31, 1096 days before the revenue period (2024-12-31); dropped rather than divided by current revenue
presents no operating result; summing the costs it tags misses its own pre-tax profit by 19.4% of revenue, far more than interest can explain, so a cost line it does not tag is missing and the sum was refused rather than used
revenue is annual, not TTM
revenue period ends 2024-12-31 (607 days ago) - the tag chain found nothing recent, so treat this row as unscored
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
reports in ARS and no currency is recorded for its share price, so the two cannot be shown to match. The price refresh records one; until it has run for this company the multiples are left out rather than assumed comparable
share count is from 2025-12-31 (242 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 5 inputs could be computed (operating margin, roic, cash operating margin not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev ebit, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, contracted coverage, gross margin stability, cash flow stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: interest cover
growth DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 4 inputs could be computed (sustained growth, margin trend, margin recent not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
4 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (quality, valuation, durability, growth -- 85% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left