Every figure this model derived for LOAN, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
418
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2025-12-31
cash
129,490
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2018-06-30
current assets
27,457,377
AssetsCurrent
2017-03-31
current liabilities
7,625,679
LiabilitiesCurrent
2017-03-31
equity
42,988,963
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
1,453,562
InterestExpense
2026-06-30
ocf
5,213,759
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
8,150,205
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
13,065
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
LOAN on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
58.3
current ratio
3.6
current ratio reported
3.6
dilution pct
-0.01
ebit cagr
-2.61
ebit yoy
-13.51
fcf margin
63.97
growth cv
2.56
interest cover
3.26
operating margin
58.1
owner earnings margin
63.81
revenue growth
-12.38
revenue growth per share
-12.37
roic
8.73
rule of 40
45.72
sbc pct revenue
0.16
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about LOAN's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability -- 35% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left