LIMITLESS X HOLDINGS INC. (LIMX)

Every figure this model derived for LIMX, the value it took, and the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked against the filing rather than taken on trust. As at 2026-06-30.

The figures, and where each came from

This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.

Figure	Value	XBRL tag	As at
capex	0	`PaymentsToAcquireProductiveAssets`	2023-12-31
cash	919,978	`CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue`	2022-09-30
current assets	555,943	`AssetsCurrent`	2026-06-30
current liabilities	7,073,000	`LiabilitiesCurrent`	2026-06-30
equity	-9,219,266	`StockholdersEquity`	2026-06-30
interest expense	629,011	`InterestExpenseNonoperating`	2026-06-30
ocf	-1,689,658	`NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities`	2026-06-30
revenue	511,811	`RevenueFromContractWithCustomerExcludingAssessedTax`	2026-06-30
sbc	5,498,021	`ShareBasedCompensation`	2025-12-31

The ratios

The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up LIMX on one particular measure came for.

Ratio	Value
cash operating margin	-507.16
current ratio	0.08
current ratio reported	0.08
fcf margin	-330.13
growth cv	1.76
interest cover	-12.87
operating margin	-1581.92
owner earnings margin	-1404.36
revenue growth	-65.73
revenue growth per share	-65.73
rule of 40	-1647.65
sbc pct revenue	1074.23

What to be careful about

What this model itself distrusts about LIMX's figures. Written by the derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.

WITHHELD: net margin -- net margin came out at -7,552% against a scale that tops out near 1,500%, which is arithmetic on a revenue figure of 511,811 rather than a margin. The figure is absent rather than corrected: there is no right value to put here.
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2023-12-31); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
diluted share count moved +204% in a year (5M to 15M, a ratio of 3.04), which is a stock split rather than issuance; growth is measured on total revenue, not per share
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality rests on 4 of 5 inputs; not tagged: roic
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage