Every figure this model derived for LII, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-03-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
148,800,000
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-03-31
cash
50,200,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-03-31
current assets
2,032,100,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-03-31
current liabilities
1,292,500,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-03-31
equity
1,213,900,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-03-31
interest expense
49,900,000
InterestExpense
2026-03-31
ocf
809,500,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-03-31
revenue
5,257,800,000
Revenues
2026-03-31
sbc
29,100,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-03-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
LII on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
22.23
current ratio
1.58
current ratio reported
1.57
deferred revenue growth
117.39
dilution pct
-1.12
ebit cagr
14.67
ebit yoy
-1.74
fcf margin
12.57
growth cv
0.82
interest cover
20.51
net debt ebitda
0.98
operating margin
19.47
owner earnings margin
12.01
revenue growth
-2.03
revenue growth per share
-0.92
roic
34.76
rule of 40
17.44
sbc pct revenue
0.55
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about LII's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2026-04-22 (130 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions