Every figure this model derived for LGNXZ, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
LGNXZ on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
62.27
current ratio
31.6
current ratio reported
31.18
deferred revenue growth
459.46
dilution pct
10.96
ebit cagr
167.51
fcf margin
45.24
growth cv
2.19
interest cover
15.3
operating margin
32.61
owner earnings margin
26.91
revenue growth
54.89
revenue growth per share
39.58
roic
10.16
rule of 40
87.49
sbc pct revenue
18.33
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about LGNXZ's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: gross margin stability