LEGGETT & PLATT INC (LEG)

Every figure this model derived for LEG, the value it took, and the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked against the filing rather than taken on trust. As at 2026-06-30.

The figures, and where each came from

This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.

Figure	Value	XBRL tag	As at
capex	80,200,000	`PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment`	2026-06-30
cash	545,800,000	`CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue`	2026-06-30
current assets	1,831,300,000	`AssetsCurrent`	2026-06-30
current liabilities	779,300,000	`LiabilitiesCurrent`	2026-06-30
equity	1,081,700,000	`StockholdersEquity`	2026-06-30
interest expense	62,800,000	`InterestExpense`	2026-06-30
ocf	237,100,000	`NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities`	2026-06-30
revenue	3,892,900,000	`RevenueFromContractWithCustomerExcludingAssessedTax`	2026-06-30
sbc	22,300,000	`ShareBasedCompensation`	2026-06-30

The ratios

The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up LEG on one particular measure came for.

Ratio	Value
cash operating margin	9.56
current ratio	2.35
current ratio reported	2.35
dilution pct	1.75
fcf margin	4.03
interest cover	3.95
net debt ebitda	2.72
operating margin	6.37
owner earnings margin	3.46
revenue growth	-8.15
revenue growth per share	-9.73
roic	9.62
rule of 40	-1.78
sbc pct revenue	0.57

What to be careful about

What this model itself distrusts about LEG's figures. Written by the derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.

presents no operating result; summed as revenue minus the costs it does tag (CostOfGoodsAndServicesSold, SellingGeneralAndAdministrativeExpense). Checked against the company's own figures: the answer lands 0.7% of revenue from the 273M pre-tax profit it reports, which is its interest and other non-operating items
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage
growth DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (margin trend, margin recent not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, growth -- 45% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left