Every figure this model derived for LANDP, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
cash
23,232,124
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
equity
673,111,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
19,259,000
InterestExpenseNonoperating
2026-06-30
ocf
27,803,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
88,483,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
LANDP on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
dilution pct
1.66
fcf margin
31.42
growth cv
158.62
owner earnings margin
31.42
revenue growth
21.6
revenue growth per share
19.61
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about LANDP's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
operating income last tagged 2018-09-30, 2830 days before the revenue period (2026-06-30); dropped rather than divided by current revenue
no current stock compensation tagged; treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no current capital expenditure tagged; treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
gross profit not tagged; rebuilt from Revenues - CostOfGoodsAndServicesSold
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 5 inputs could be computed (operating margin, roic, cash operating margin not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev ebit, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
resilience DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 3 inputs could be computed (interest cover, liquidity not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (margin trend, margin recent not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
5 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (quality, valuation, durability, resilience, growth -- 100% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left