Every figure this model derived for KSEZ, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
0
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-03-31
cash
0
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
572,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
2,754,687
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
-1,250,988
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
110,502
InterestExpenseNonoperating
2025-12-31
ocf
-753,787
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
1,068,792
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
1,593,805
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
KSEZ on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
192.78
current ratio
0.21
current ratio reported
0.21
dilution pct
13.38
fcf margin
-70.53
interest cover
3.88
net debt ebitda
1.1
operating margin
40.12
owner earnings margin
-219.65
revenue growth
418.5
revenue growth per share
357.32
rule of 40
458.63
sbc pct revenue
149.12
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about KSEZ's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
invested capital is -1M (cash exceeds equity plus debt), so return on capital is unbounded rather than undefined; scored as maximal
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, contracted coverage, gross margin stability, cash flow stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (sustained growth, margin trend not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
3 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability, growth -- 55% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left