Every figure this model derived for KIDZW, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
32,583
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-06-30
cash
5,878,823
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
8,919,637
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
2,294,787
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
9,949,689
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
0
InterestPaidNet
2026-06-30
ocf
-4,653,626
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
2,825,786
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
715,305
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
KIDZW on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-83.58
current ratio
15.02
current ratio reported
3.89
deferred revenue growth
-31.39
fcf margin
-165.84
operating margin
-128.81
owner earnings margin
-191.15
revenue growth
-16.68
revenue growth per share
-16.68
roic
-70.64
rule of 40
-145.49
sbc pct revenue
25.31
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about KIDZW's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2026-03-31 (152 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
no debt and no profit, so interest cover cannot be measured; scored on cash runway instead: 6M of net cash against a 5M annual burn is 1.3 years
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, gross margin stability, cash flow stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: sustained growth
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability -- 35% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left