Every figure this model derived for JLL, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
0
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2019-09-30
cash
458,200,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
7,825,900,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
6,951,500,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
7,461,700,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
103,000,000
InterestPaidNet
2026-06-30
ocf
1,362,000,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
27,433,500,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
1,500,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
JLL on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
5.49
current ratio
1.17
current ratio reported
1.13
deferred revenue growth
17.55
dilution pct
-0.12
ebit cagr
11.65
ebit yoy
38.87
fcf margin
4.96
growth cv
0.6
interest cover
12.39
net debt ebitda
0.78
operating margin
4.65
owner earnings margin
4.96
revenue growth
11.17
revenue growth per share
11.31
roic
11.67
rule of 40
15.83
sbc pct revenue
0.01
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about JLL's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2019-09-30); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: gross margin stability