Every figure this model derived for JF, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
JF on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-71.09
current ratio
1.25
current ratio reported
1.25
dilution pct
4.93
ev owner earnings
4158.68
ev sales
343.52
fcf margin
9.14
operating margin
-83.85
owner earnings margin
8.26
roic
-48.12
sbc pct revenue
0.88
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about JF's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no current capital expenditure tagged; treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
there is no operating profit to value; valuation rests on EV/revenue (343.5x) instead
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: interest cover
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: revenue growth
no interest expense tagged while 2M of debt is on the balance sheet, so interest cover is unmeasured rather than perfect