Every figure this model derived for JANL, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
0
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2022-09-30
cash
33,697,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
104,159,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
131,905,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
27,218,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
931,000
InterestPaidNet
2026-06-30
ocf
45,568,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
237,208,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
310,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
JANL on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
3.49
current ratio
0.79
current ratio reported
0.79
dilution pct
-0.07
ebit cagr
-6.82
ebit yoy
15.54
fcf margin
19.21
growth cv
1.72
interest cover
7.83
operating margin
3.07
owner earnings margin
19.08
revenue growth
15.98
revenue growth per share
16.05
roic
250.22
rule of 40
19.05
sbc pct revenue
0.13
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about JANL's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2022-09-30); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage