Every figure this model derived for IVDN, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-04-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
71,603
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-04-30
cash
358,308
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-04-30
current assets
1,661,410
AssetsCurrent
2026-04-30
current liabilities
195,848
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-04-30
equity
2,327,280
StockholdersEquity
2026-04-30
interest expense
5,613
InterestExpense
2026-04-30
ocf
463,306
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-04-30
revenue
2,865,731
Revenues
2026-04-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
IVDN on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
19.12
current ratio
8.48
current ratio reported
8.48
dilution pct
2.79
ebit yoy
33.46
fcf margin
13.67
growth cv
1.18
interest cover
95.47
operating margin
18.7
owner earnings margin
13.67
revenue growth
21.59
revenue growth per share
18.29
roic
21.5
rule of 40
40.29
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about IVDN's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no current stock compensation tagged; treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2026-04-30 (122 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
gross profit last tagged 2024-04-30 and no cost of sales line to rebuild it from; dropped from durability
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability -- 35% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left