INDEPENDENCE POWER HOLDINGS, INC. (ITXP)

Every figure this model derived for ITXP, the value it took, and the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked against the filing rather than taken on trust. As at 2025-12-31.

The figures, and where each came from

This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.

Figure	Value	XBRL tag	As at
capex	0	`PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment`	2025-07-31
cash	164,293	`CashCashEquivalentsRestrictedCashAndRestrictedCashEquivalents`	2026-06-30
current assets	66,308,462	`AssetsCurrent`	2026-06-30
current liabilities	2,339,244	`LiabilitiesCurrent`	2026-06-30
equity	72,752,820	`StockholdersEquity`	2026-06-30
interest expense	688,325	`InterestExpense`	2025-12-31
ocf	-337,267	`NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities`	2025-12-31
revenue	97,207,466	`Revenues`	2025-12-31

The ratios

The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up ITXP on one particular measure came for.

Ratio	Value
cash operating margin	88.2
current ratio	28.35
current ratio reported	28.35
dilution pct	0.1
fcf margin	-0.35
interest cover	124.56
operating margin	88.2
owner earnings margin	-0.35
revenue growth	439216.07
revenue growth per share	438768.63
roic	93.31
rule of 40	439304.27
sbc pct revenue	0.0

What to be careful about

What this model itself distrusts about ITXP's figures. Written by the derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.

revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no current stock compensation tagged; treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2026-05-12 (110 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, gross margin stability, cash flow stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (sustained growth, margin trend not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
3 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability, growth -- 55% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left