INTEGRA RESOURCES CORP. (ITRG)

Every figure this model derived for ITRG, the value it took, and the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked against the filing rather than taken on trust. As at 2025-12-31.

The figures, and where each came from

This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.

Figure	Value	XBRL tag	As at
capex	47,159,000	`PurchaseOfPropertyPlantAndEquipmentClassifiedAsInvestingActivities`	2025-12-31
cash	63,086,000	`CashAndCashEquivalents`	2025-12-31
current assets	129,814,000	`CurrentAssets`	2025-12-31
current liabilities	36,907,000	`CurrentLiabilities`	2025-12-31
equity	185,246,000	`Equity`	2025-12-31
interest expense	227,000	`InterestExpense`	2024-12-31
ocf	72,254,000	`CashFlowsFromUsedInOperatingActivities`	2025-12-31
revenue	243,926,000	`RevenueFromContractsWithCustomers`	2025-12-31
sbc	1,970,000	`AdjustmentsForSharebasedPayments`	2025-12-31

The ratios

The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up ITRG on one particular measure came for.

Ratio	Value
cash operating margin	34.54
current ratio	3.52
current ratio reported	3.52
dilution pct	75.59
fcf margin	10.29
interest cover	296.92
operating margin	27.63
owner earnings margin	9.48
revenue growth	703.71
revenue growth per share	357.72
roic	36.98
rule of 40	731.34
sbc pct revenue	0.81

What to be careful about

What this model itself distrusts about ITRG's figures. Written by the derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.

revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2025-12-31 (242 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, contracted coverage, gross margin stability, cash flow stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (sustained growth, margin trend not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
3 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability, growth -- 55% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left