Every figure this model derived for ITOX, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
cash
8,651
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
22,299
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
3,187,706
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
-4,350,807
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
258,273
InterestExpenseNonoperating
2026-06-30
ocf
-200,461
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
0
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
0
ShareBasedCompensation
2024-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
ITOX on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
current ratio
0.01
current ratio reported
0.01
deferred revenue growth
0.0
dilution pct
3.55
growth cv
3.36
interest cover
-1.81
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about ITOX's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
operating income last tagged 2016-12-31, 3468 days before the revenue period (2026-06-30); dropped rather than divided by current revenue
no operating income tagged; derived as revenue minus OperatingExpenses
no current stock compensation tagged (last tagged 2024-12-31); treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no current capital expenditure tagged; treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 5 inputs could be computed (operating margin, roic, sbc discipline, owner earnings, cash operating margin not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage
growth DROPPED from the total: only 1 of 4 inputs could be computed (revenue growth, margin trend, margin recent not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
3 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (quality, valuation, growth -- 75% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left