Every figure this model derived for IRMD, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
2,020,000
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-06-30
cash
59,080,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
86,722,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
9,164,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
101,748,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
ocf
27,138,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
86,338,963
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
2,853,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
IRMD on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
37.11
current ratio
15.23
current ratio reported
9.46
deferred revenue growth
6.49
dilution pct
0.55
ebit cagr
17.61
ebit yoy
15.73
fcf margin
29.09
growth cv
0.35
operating margin
31.92
owner earnings margin
25.79
revenue growth
11.21
revenue growth per share
10.61
roic
51.02
rule of 40
43.13
sbc pct revenue
3.3
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about IRMD's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions