Every figure this model derived for INR, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
20,107,000
PaymentsToAcquireOtherPropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-06-30
cash
25,883,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
162,740,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
187,170,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
398,949,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
9,656,000
InterestPaidNet
2026-06-30
ocf
313,433,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
522,681,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
9,696,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
INR on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
69.38
current ratio
0.91
current ratio reported
0.87
deferred revenue growth
172.63
ebit cagr
75.3
fcf margin
56.12
interest cover
22.17
operating margin
40.95
owner earnings margin
54.26
revenue growth
75.4
revenue growth per share
75.4
roic
45.32
rule of 40
116.35
sbc pct revenue
1.86
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about INR's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no usable diluted share count, so growth is measured on total revenue rather than per share; a company issuing shares to fund that growth reads better than it is
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: sustained growth
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability -- 35% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left