Every figure this model derived for IDT, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-04-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
IDT on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
14.63
current ratio
2.1
current ratio reported
1.92
deferred revenue growth
-4.75
dilution pct
-0.41
ebit cagr
17.46
ebit yoy
11.31
fcf margin
5.77
interest cover
998.55
operating margin
11.45
owner earnings margin
4.82
revenue growth
4.82
revenue growth per share
5.25
rule of 40
16.27
sbc pct revenue
0.95
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about IDT's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
only 272 days of filings, not a full year: margins and growth are measured, but return on capital and every enterprise-value multiple are refused rather than annualised
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2026-04-30 (122 days old, weighted average diluted); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality rests on 4 of 5 inputs; not tagged: roic
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev ebit, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage