Every figure this model derived for IBM, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
1,098,000,000
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-06-30
cash
7,772,000,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
28,398,000,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
35,912,000,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
34,452,000,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
1,929,000,000
InterestExpense
2026-06-30
ocf
14,888,000,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
69,096,000,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
1,877,000,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
IBM on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
22.07
current ratio
1.44
current ratio reported
0.79
deferred revenue growth
-7.08
dilution pct
1.23
ev ebit
25.12
ev owner earnings
23.44
ev sales
4.04
fcf margin
19.96
growth cv
0.54
interest cover
5.76
net debt ebitda
4.05
operating margin
16.08
owner earnings margin
17.24
revenue growth
7.9
revenue growth per share
6.58
roic
9.9
rpo growth
3.03
rule of 40
23.98
sbc pct revenue
2.72
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about IBM's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
presents no operating result; summed as revenue minus the costs it does tag (CostOfRevenue, SellingGeneralAndAdministrativeExpense, ResearchAndDevelopmentExpense). Checked against the company's own figures: the answer lands 1.0% of revenue from the 10,439M pre-tax profit it reports, which is its interest and other non-operating items
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
growth DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (margin trend, margin recent not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions