Every figure this model derived for HYOR, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
0
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2015-03-31
cash
53,912
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
90,453
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
725,359
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
21,208,771
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
interest expense
21,575
InterestExpense
2026-06-30
ocf
-336,057
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-31
revenue
59,124
Revenues
2025-12-31
sbc
27,463
AllocatedShareBasedCompensationExpense
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
HYOR on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-910.54
current ratio
0.12
current ratio reported
0.12
dilution pct
6.96
fcf margin
-568.39
interest cover
-26.23
operating margin
-956.99
owner earnings margin
-614.84
revenue growth
-90.42
revenue growth per share
-91.04
roic
-2.1
rule of 40
-1047.41
sbc pct revenue
46.45
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about HYOR's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2015-03-31); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, contracted coverage, gross margin stability, cash flow stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (sustained growth, margin trend not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
3 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability, growth -- 55% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left