Every figure this model derived for HTLM, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
1,136,453
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2025-12-31
cash
27,276,091
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2025-12-31
current assets
125,765,852
AssetsCurrent
2025-12-31
current liabilities
105,360,761
LiabilitiesCurrent
2025-12-31
equity
27,841,310
StockholdersEquity
2025-12-31
interest expense
1,406,903
InterestExpenseNonoperating
2025-12-31
ocf
13,479,592
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-31
revenue
377,876,123
Revenues
2025-12-31
sbc
73,200
ShareBasedCompensation
2024-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
HTLM on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
5.28
current ratio
1.19
current ratio reported
1.19
dilution pct
0.0
ebit cagr
196.46
ebit yoy
103.66
fcf margin
3.27
growth cv
1.41
interest cover
13.77
operating margin
5.13
owner earnings margin
3.25
revenue growth
12.78
revenue growth per share
12.78
roic
2707.51
rule of 40
17.9
sbc pct revenue
0.02
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about HTLM's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2025-12-31 (242 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: sustained growth