Every figure this model derived for HTCO, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-10-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
5,071
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2025-10-31
cash
10,140,032
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2025-10-31
current assets
30,289,442
AssetsCurrent
2025-10-31
current liabilities
19,731,187
LiabilitiesCurrent
2025-10-31
equity
7,876,877
StockholdersEquity
2025-10-31
interest expense
45,935
InterestExpenseDebt
2025-10-31
ocf
4,631,918
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-10-31
revenue
214,415,912
Revenues
2025-10-31
sbc
21,922,261
ShareBasedCompensation
2025-10-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
HTCO on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
0.94
current ratio
2.46
current ratio reported
1.54
deferred revenue growth
28.41
dilution pct
132.52
fcf margin
2.16
growth cv
1.44
interest cover
-433.49
operating margin
-9.29
owner earnings margin
-8.07
revenue growth
98.21
revenue growth per share
-14.75
rule of 40
88.92
sbc pct revenue
10.22
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about HTCO's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2025-10-31 (303 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality rests on 4 of 5 inputs; not tagged: roic
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions