Every figure this model derived for HSDT, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
0
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2024-12-31
cash
3,647,000
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
28,746,000
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
2,159,000
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
165,645,000
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
ocf
-26,944,000
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
12,072,000
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
8,372,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
HSDT on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
current ratio
13.31
current ratio reported
13.31
deferred revenue growth
-81.76
dilution pct
619973.13
fcf margin
-223.19
growth cv
2.02
owner earnings margin
-292.54
revenue growth
3992.2
revenue growth per share
-99.34
roic
-179.85
rule of 40
937.23
sbc pct revenue
69.35
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about HSDT's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
WITHHELD: operating margin, cash operating margin, ebitda margin -- operating margin came out at -3,055% against a scale that tops out near 2,500%, which is arithmetic on a revenue figure of 12,072,000 rather than a margin. The figure is absent rather than corrected: there is no right value to put here.
no current capital expenditure tagged (last tagged 2024-12-31); treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no debt and no profit, so interest cover cannot be measured; scored on cash runway instead: 4M of net cash against a 27M annual burn is 0.1 years
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality rests on 3 of 5 inputs; not tagged: operating margin, cash operating margin
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage