Every figure this model derived for HNOI, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-04-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
63,167
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2026-04-30
cash
145,670
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-04-30
current assets
145,670
AssetsCurrent
2026-04-30
current liabilities
2,759,638
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-04-30
equity
-1,961,103
StockholdersEquity
2026-04-30
interest expense
897
InterestPaidNet
2026-04-30
ocf
-626,978
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-04-30
revenue
55,674
Revenues
2026-04-30
sbc
241,380
AllocatedShareBasedCompensationExpense
2026-04-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
HNOI on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-1103.27
current ratio
0.05
current ratio reported
0.05
dilution pct
-61.44
fcf margin
-1239.62
growth cv
1.62
interest cover
-1245.72
operating margin
-2007.06
owner earnings margin
-1673.18
revenue growth
16.11
revenue growth per share
201.08
rule of 40
-1990.95
sbc pct revenue
433.56
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about HNOI's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
WITHHELD: net margin -- net margin came out at -2,276% against a scale that tops out near 1,500%, which is arithmetic on a revenue figure of 55,674 rather than a margin. The figure is absent rather than corrected: there is no right value to put here.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality rests on 4 of 5 inputs; not tagged: roic
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: sustained growth