Every figure this model derived for HLP, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
217,443
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2025-12-31
cash
2,073,171
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2025-12-31
current assets
16,084,060
AssetsCurrent
2025-12-31
current liabilities
14,358,522
LiabilitiesCurrent
2025-12-31
equity
57,832,123
StockholdersEquity
2025-12-31
interest expense
165,003
InterestExpenseDebt
2025-12-31
ocf
878,267
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-31
revenue
19,600,691
Revenues
2025-12-31
sbc
1,968,000
ShareBasedCompensation
2024-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
HLP on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
25.96
current ratio
1.13
current ratio reported
1.12
deferred revenue growth
-26.29
dilution pct
321.22
ebit cagr
-11.33
fcf margin
3.37
growth cv
2.3
interest cover
14.75
net debt ebitda
2.35
operating margin
12.41
owner earnings margin
-6.67
revenue growth
38.96
revenue growth per share
-67.01
roic
2.95
rule of 40
51.37
sbc pct revenue
10.04
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about HLP's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2025-12-31 (242 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions