Every figure this model derived for HKD, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-10-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
HKD on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
21.34
current ratio
1.93
current ratio reported
1.92
deferred revenue growth
-43.92
dilution pct
61.2
ebit cagr
-96.97
ebit yoy
-96.97
fcf margin
28.62
growth cv
1.84
net debt ebitda
36.85
operating margin
2.24
owner earnings margin
28.44
revenue growth
119.47
revenue growth per share
36.15
roic
0.14
rule of 40
121.72
sbc pct revenue
0.17
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about HKD's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
revenue is annual, not TTM
operating income is annual, not TTM
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2025-10-31 (303 days old, weighted average diluted); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (gross margin stability, cash flow stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: interest cover
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability -- 35% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left
no interest expense tagged while 437M of debt is on the balance sheet, so interest cover is unmeasured rather than perfect