Every figure this model derived for HIMS, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
HIMS on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
3.35
current ratio
1.03
current ratio reported
0.93
deferred revenue growth
43.66
dilution pct
9.05
ev owner earnings
-78.15
ev sales
2.79
fcf margin
2.39
growth cv
0.17
operating margin
-5.99
owner earnings margin
-3.57
revenue growth
28.04
revenue growth per share
17.41
roic
-14.39
rule of 40
22.05
sbc pct revenue
5.96
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about HIMS's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
there is no operating profit to value; valuation rests on EV/revenue (2.8x) instead
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: interest cover
no interest expense tagged while 1,365M of debt is on the balance sheet, so interest cover is unmeasured rather than perfect