The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc. (HIG)

Every figure this model derived for HIG, the value it took, and the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked against the filing rather than taken on trust. As at 2026-06-30.

The figures, and where each came from

This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.

Figure	Value	XBRL tag	As at
capex	7,000,000	`PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment`	2026-06-30
cash	4,069,000,000	`CashCashEquivalentsRestrictedCashAndRestrictedCashEquivalents`	2026-06-30
equity	19,633,000,000	`StockholdersEquity`	2026-06-30
interest expense	199,000,000	`InterestExpense`	2026-06-30
ocf	5,880,000,000	`NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities`	2026-06-30
revenue	29,060,000,000	`Revenues`	2026-06-30
sbc	141,000,000	`AllocatedShareBasedCompensationExpense`	2025-12-31

The ratios

The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up HIG on one particular measure came for.

Ratio	Value
cash operating margin	19.23
dilution pct	-4.05
ebit cagr	25.6
ebit yoy	26.01
fcf margin	20.21
growth cv	0.53
interest cover	25.22
net debt ebitda	0.06
operating margin	17.27
owner earnings margin	19.72
revenue growth	7.01
revenue growth per share	11.53
roic	19.89
rule of 40	24.28
sbc pct revenue	0.49

What to be careful about

What this model itself distrusts about HIG's figures. Written by the derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.

operating income last tagged 2010-12-31, 5660 days before the revenue period (2026-06-30); dropped rather than divided by current revenue
no operating income tagged; derived as revenue minus BenefitsLossesAndExpenses
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (contracted coverage, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: liquidity
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability -- 35% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left