HEALTHIER CHOICES MANAGEMENT CORP. (HCMC)

Every figure this model derived for HCMC, the value it took, and the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked against the filing rather than taken on trust. As at 2025-12-31.

The figures, and where each came from

This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.

Figure	Value	XBRL tag	As at
capex	47,185	`PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment`	2024-12-31
cash	1,198,796	`CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue`	2026-06-30
current assets	1,391,240	`AssetsCurrent`	2026-06-30
current liabilities	2,120,346	`LiabilitiesCurrent`	2026-06-30
equity	-1,736,928	`StockholdersEquity`	2026-06-30
interest expense	582	`InterestPaidNet`	2025-12-31
ocf	-2,509,593	`NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities`	2026-06-30
revenue	2,979	`RevenueFromContractWithCustomerExcludingAssessedTax`	2025-12-31
sbc	1,250,000	`AllocatedShareBasedCompensationExpense`	2026-06-30

The ratios

The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up HCMC on one particular measure came for.

Ratio	Value
current ratio	0.66
current ratio reported	0.66
deferred revenue growth	-16.34
dilution pct	0.33
growth cv	2.14
interest cover	-6154.54
revenue growth	494.61
revenue growth per share	492.67
rule of 40	-119745.17

What to be careful about

What this model itself distrusts about HCMC's figures. Written by the derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.

WITHHELD: operating margin, cash operating margin, sbc pct revenue, owner earnings margin, fcf margin, net margin, capex intensity, ocf margin, ebitda margin -- owner earnings margin came out at -127,787% against a scale that tops out near 1,750%, which is arithmetic on a revenue figure of 2,979 rather than a margin. The figure is absent rather than corrected: there is no right value to put here.
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 5 inputs could be computed (operating margin, roic, sbc discipline, owner earnings, cash operating margin not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: contracted coverage
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (quality, valuation -- 55% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left