Every figure this model derived for HCIL, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2025-12-31.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
capex
996,407
PaymentsToAcquirePropertyPlantAndEquipment
2025-12-31
cash
551,778
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2025-12-31
current assets
8,180,363
AssetsCurrent
2025-12-31
current liabilities
9,679,701
LiabilitiesCurrent
2025-12-31
equity
42,293,864
StockholdersEquity
2025-12-31
interest expense
409,105
InterestPaidNet
2025-12-31
ocf
2,147,719
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2025-12-31
revenue
18,230,165
Revenues
2025-12-31
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
HCIL on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
19.03
current ratio
0.85
current ratio reported
0.85
deferred revenue growth
4.31
dilution pct
15.2
fcf margin
6.32
growth cv
2.02
interest cover
6.72
net debt ebitda
1.9
operating margin
15.09
owner earnings margin
6.32
revenue growth
535.84
revenue growth per share
451.93
roic
4.45
rule of 40
550.93
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about HCIL's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no current stock compensation tagged; treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
share count is from 2026-02-11 (200 days old, dei cover page); a stock split since then would make the market cap wrong. Set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml to be sure.
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions