Every figure this model derived for HAFG, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
cash
47,849
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
1,590,066
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
1,957,423
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
-367,357
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
ocf
23,997
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
3,393,069
Revenues
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
HAFG on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-1.31
current ratio
0.81
current ratio reported
0.81
dilution pct
28.53
fcf margin
0.71
operating margin
-1.31
owner earnings margin
0.71
revenue growth
604.29
revenue growth per share
447.95
rule of 40
602.98
sbc pct revenue
0.0
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about HAFG's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no current stock compensation tagged; treated as zero, so owner earnings are overstated
no current capital expenditure tagged; treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
quality rests on 4 of 5 inputs; not tagged: roic
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, contracted coverage, gross margin stability, cash flow stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
resilience rests on 2 of 3 inputs; not tagged: interest cover
growth rests on 3 of 4 inputs; not tagged: sustained growth
2 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability -- 35% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left