Every figure this model derived for GXAI, the value it took, and
the element in the company's own XBRL it was read from — so any of it can be checked
against the filing rather than taken on trust.
As at 2026-06-30.
The figures, and where each came from
This is the part no other screener shows. Each figure below names the XBRL element it
was read from, so it can be checked against the filing itself.
Figure
Value
XBRL tag
As at
cash
11,442,489
CashAndCashEquivalentsAtCarryingValue
2026-06-30
current assets
11,894,610
AssetsCurrent
2026-06-30
current liabilities
1,125,562
LiabilitiesCurrent
2026-06-30
equity
17,291,048
StockholdersEquity
2026-06-30
ocf
-5,420,744
NetCashProvidedByUsedInOperatingActivities
2026-06-30
revenue
6,005,051
Revenues
2026-06-30
sbc
172,605
ShareBasedCompensation
2026-06-30
The ratios
The figures themselves rather than their scores — what somebody looking up
GXAI on one particular measure came for.
Ratio
Value
cash operating margin
-112.93
current ratio
15.59
current ratio reported
10.57
deferred revenue growth
63951.59
fcf margin
-90.27
operating margin
-115.8
owner earnings margin
-93.14
revenue growth
2922.0
revenue growth per share
2922.0
roic
-93.93
rule of 40
2806.2
sbc pct revenue
2.87
What to be careful about
What this model itself distrusts about GXAI's figures. Written by the
derivation as it ran, not added afterwards.
no current capital expenditure tagged; treated as zero, so free cash flow is overstated and equals operating cash flow
no market cap; set `market_cap` in overrides.yaml
diluted share count moved +299% in a year (2M to 7M, a ratio of 3.99), which is a stock split rather than issuance; growth is measured on total revenue, not per share
no debt and no profit, so interest cover cannot be measured; scored on cash runway instead: 11M of net cash against a 5M annual burn is 2.1 years
no forward EPS estimate; growth rests on filings only. Analyst consensus is not published in XBRL, so it has to be fetched from a data provider or set by hand in overrides.yaml as `eps_growth_2y`
valuation DROPPED from the total: only 0 of 2 inputs could be computed (ev sales, ev owner earnings not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
durability DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (worst year, gross margin stability not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
growth DROPPED from the total: only 2 of 4 inputs could be computed (sustained growth, margin trend not tagged), so the score is not meaningful. Its weight is spread over the other dimensions
3 of 5 dimensions could not be measured (valuation, durability, growth -- 55% of the model), so this row is not comparable with the others; its total rests on what was left